The result of an electoral survey, regarding voter preference in relation to two candidates, was represented by means of Graph 1. When this result was published in a newspaper, Graph 1 was cut during layout, as shown in Graph 2. Although the values presented were correct and the width of the columns was the same, many readers criticized the format of Graph 2 printed in the newspaper, claiming that there was visual harm to candidate B. The difference between the ratios of the height of column B to column A in graphs 1 and 2 is (A) 0 (B) $\frac{1}{2}$ (C) $\frac{1}{5}$ (D) $\frac{2}{15}$ (E) $\frac{8}{35}$
The result of an electoral survey, regarding voter preference in relation to two candidates, was represented by means of Graph 1. When this result was published in a newspaper, Graph 1 was cut during layout, as shown in Graph 2. Although the values presented were correct and the width of the columns was the same, many readers criticized the format of Graph 2 printed in the newspaper, claiming that there was visual harm to candidate B.
The difference between the ratios of the height of column B to column A in graphs 1 and 2 is\\
(A) 0\\
(B) $\frac{1}{2}$\\
(C) $\frac{1}{5}$\\
(D) $\frac{2}{15}$\\
(E) $\frac{8}{35}$