We have two finite sequences of real numbers $0 = t_1 < t_2 < \cdots < t_K$ ($K \geqslant 2$) and $x_1 < x_2 < \cdots < x_L$ ($L \geqslant 2$). The formula from question 32 applied at $t_i$ with $n$ sufficiently large allows us to estimate $\lambda(t_i)$ by an approximate value $\hat{\lambda}(t_i)$. Justify that for all $i \in \{1, \ldots, L\}$, $$\hat{\lambda}^*\left(x_i\right) = \max_{1 \leqslant j \leqslant K} \left(t_j x_i - \hat{\lambda}\left(t_j\right)\right)$$ constitutes a reasonable approximate value of $\lambda^*\left(x_i\right)$.
We have two finite sequences of real numbers $0 = t_1 < t_2 < \cdots < t_K$ ($K \geqslant 2$) and $x_1 < x_2 < \cdots < x_L$ ($L \geqslant 2$). The formula from question 32 applied at $t_i$ with $n$ sufficiently large allows us to estimate $\lambda(t_i)$ by an approximate value $\hat{\lambda}(t_i)$. Justify that for all $i \in \{1, \ldots, L\}$,
$$\hat{\lambda}^*\left(x_i\right) = \max_{1 \leqslant j \leqslant K} \left(t_j x_i - \hat{\lambda}\left(t_j\right)\right)$$
constitutes a reasonable approximate value of $\lambda^*\left(x_i\right)$.