grandes-ecoles 2015 QIV.D.2

grandes-ecoles · France · centrale-maths1__mp Continuous Probability Distributions and Random Variables Change of Variable and Integral Evaluation

We consider a function $f$ in $\mathcal{B}_1$ such that $\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}$ and $\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$ are in $\mathcal{B}_2$. The Radon inversion formula states: $\forall (x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2,\ f(x,y) = \frac{-1}{\pi} \int_0^{+\infty} \frac{R_{x,y}^{\prime}(q)}{q}\,\mathrm{d}q$.
Are the hypotheses made on $f$ necessary for the Radon inversion formula to be verified at the point $(x,y) = (0,0)$?

We consider a function $f$ in $\mathcal{B}_1$ such that $\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}$ and $\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$ are in $\mathcal{B}_2$. The Radon inversion formula states: $\forall (x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2,\ f(x,y) = \frac{-1}{\pi} \int_0^{+\infty} \frac{R_{x,y}^{\prime}(q)}{q}\,\mathrm{d}q$.

Are the hypotheses made on $f$ necessary for the Radon inversion formula to be verified at the point $(x,y) = (0,0)$?

Paper Questions

QI.A.1 QI.A.2 QI.A.3 QI.A.4 QI.A.5 QI.B.1 QI.B.2 QI.B.3 QI.B.4 QI.C.1 QI.C.2 QI.C.3 QI.C.4 QII.A.1 QII.A.2 QII.A.3 QII.A.4 QII.B.1 QII.B.2 QII.B.3 QII.B.4 QIII.A QIII.B QIII.C.1 QIII.C.2 QIII.C.3 QIV.A.1 QIV.A.2 QIV.B.1 QIV.B.2 QIV.B.3 QIV.C.1 QIV.C.2 QIV.C.3 QIV.D.1 QIV.D.2 QIV.D.3 QV.A.1 QV.A.2 QV.A.3 QV.B.1 QV.B.2